Skip to content

fix: crash from non-equip-able artefacts#951

Merged
OH296 merged 1 commit intoAdeptus-Dominus:mainfrom
OH296:lib_arti_fix
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

fix: crash from non-equip-able artefacts#951
OH296 merged 1 commit intoAdeptus-Dominus:mainfrom
OH296:lib_arti_fix

Conversation

@OH296
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@OH296 OH296 commented Jul 29, 2025

Purpose and Description

  • Self-descriptive.

Testing done

  • None, and I understand the risks.

Related things and/or additional context

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 29, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved reliability when displaying data by ensuring only valid structured data is accessed.
    • Simplified text rendering for "Librarium" to ensure consistent display.

Walkthrough

Behold, acolytes! The script now invokes the Omnissiah’s wisdom by explicitly verifying that arti_data is a struct before field access, and it ceases unnecessary string transformations in text rendering. No further logic or exported entity incantations were altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Type Checking and Text Rendering Adjustments
scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml
Replaced truthy check with explicit struct validation for arti_data; simplified text rendering by removing string_hash_to_newline usage.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Type: Fix, Size: Tiny

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 020dbe8 and 5d29250.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.gml

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.gml: - Macro constants require a space between the constant name and value. Without it, the compiler will throw an error. I.e. #macro ARR_body_parts["arm"] will crash the game, because there is no space between the array and the name of the macro.

Files:

  • scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml
**/*.*

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.*: - Having humanly understandable and maintainable code is always the top most priority.

Files:

  • scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: EttyKitty
PR: Adeptus-Dominus/ChapterMaster#647
File: scripts/scr_en_weapon/scr_en_weapon.gml:24-928
Timestamp: 2025-03-29T10:30:25.598Z
Learning: A data-driven approach for weapon management in `scripts/scr_en_weapon/scr_en_weapon.gml` is planned for a future PR, not within the scope of PR #647.
Learnt from: MCPO-Spartan-117
PR: Adeptus-Dominus/ChapterMaster#526
File: objects/obj_popup/Draw_0.gml:234-239
Timestamp: 2025-03-01T11:06:25.427Z
Learning: The comment "Need to modify ^^^^ based on if it is chaos or daemonic" in the artifact gifting code is intentionally kept as a reminder that this implementation is not yet finished, despite the significant refactoring already done.
Learnt from: EttyKitty
PR: Adeptus-Dominus/ChapterMaster#878
File: scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml:1256-1352
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T17:12:13.045Z
Learning: In scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml, the weapon visual data declarations contain known DRY violations that are acknowledged by the development team but deferred to future refactoring efforts rather than addressed in individual feature PRs.
Learnt from: EttyKitty
PR: Adeptus-Dominus/ChapterMaster#878
File: scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml:1256-1352
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T17:12:13.045Z
Learning: In scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml, the weapon visual data declarations contain known DRY violations that are acknowledged by the development team but deferred to future refactoring efforts rather than addressed in individual feature PRs.
scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml (4)

Learnt from: EttyKitty
PR: #878
File: scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml:1256-1352
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T17:12:13.045Z
Learning: In scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml, the weapon visual data declarations contain known DRY violations that are acknowledged by the development team but deferred to future refactoring efforts rather than addressed in individual feature PRs.

Learnt from: EttyKitty
PR: #878
File: scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml:1256-1352
Timestamp: 2025-06-16T17:12:13.045Z
Learning: In scripts/scr_culture_visuals/scr_culture_visuals.gml, the weapon visual data declarations contain known DRY violations that are acknowledged by the development team but deferred to future refactoring efforts rather than addressed in individual feature PRs.

Learnt from: MCPO-Spartan-117
PR: #526
File: objects/obj_popup/Draw_0.gml:234-239
Timestamp: 2025-03-01T11:06:25.427Z
Learning: The comment "Need to modify ^^^^ based on if it is chaos or daemonic" in the artifact gifting code is intentionally kept as a reminder that this implementation is not yet finished, despite the significant refactoring already done.

Learnt from: OH296
PR: #646
File: objects/obj_pnunit/Alarm_5.gml:84-91
Timestamp: 2025-03-31T23:32:30.003Z
Learning: In obj_pnunit/Alarm_5.gml, the function get_armour_data("maintenance") will always return a numeric value (at minimum 0), making null/undefined checks unnecessary.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
scripts/scr_librarium/scr_librarium.gml (3)

105-108: Struct-validation fix is sound

The reordered predicate plus is_struct(arti_data) invocation correctly guards against field access on non-struct artefact data, eliminating the crash reported. Logical short-circuit ensures the extra check is only evaluated for non-device base types. Well executed.


176-178: Verify text-layout after dropping string_hash_to_newline

Using the raw literal "Librarium" removes the previous hash-to-newline conversion. This should be harmless for a single-word title, yet confirm no unintended line-break or localisation side-effects appear in game UI.


186-188: Same string simplification here—double-check consistency

As above, confirm the visual output in the second branch remains aligned with design expectations.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Size: Tiny Type: Fix This is a fix for a bug labels Jul 29, 2025
@OH296 OH296 merged commit 3e29fd9 into Adeptus-Dominus:main Jul 29, 2025
3 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Blogaugis Blogaugis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might want to support changing department names at some point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Size: Tiny Type: Fix This is a fix for a bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants