-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
igv: import from homebrew/science #18736
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Circle and Travis aren't relevant ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Woups. Done.
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be shell_output("#{bin}/igv -b script", 1) if that's the exit code on BrewTestBot. But we need a real test here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
igv has a graphical interface, so not sure how we want to test that.
The -b flag does the follwing (http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/startingIGV):
-b , --batch= Immediately run the supplied batch script after start up.
I think that test is not so bad. We could also try to download a file from a server with it and run a batch script on it. Not sure it is worth it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes a -b test would be good
|
2.4.2 is out |
|
Bumping it in science first: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-science/pull/6385 |
|
This is now igv 2.4.2, revision 1. Should I do something for the test or are you happy with it? |
|
@ilovezfs How do you feel about this? You had still some concerns about the test but I am not sure if I can find anything better, see my comment above. |
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not needed
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
libexec
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
|
🤖, talk to the hand. |
|
Note to myself: 2.4.4 has been pushed to science. I'll try to find some time today to update this PR. |
|
ping |
I'll change that too. |
|
Actually the line is: |
|
CC @GauthamGoli hmm that doesn't look right to me. |
|
@iMichka the audit will probably be happy with |
|
Done. |
|
|
All green :) |
Formula/igv.rb
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should note the minimum version
|
Done. The minimum is java 8. No clue if this works with java 9. |
|
How's this PR looking? |
|
Good to go for me. |
|
Thanks @iMichka! |
|
Thanks! |
brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingbrew install <formula>)?