Skip to content

Conversation

@vorburger
Copy link
Member

@glaforge SGTY - LGTM? Re. #102.

@cornellgit @Poggecci any objections to this? Makes contrib/ (much) simpler - IMHO.

OK to merge? Or do we need to have a UN security council vote (just joking) to further discuss this?

@Poggecci
Copy link
Contributor

Poggecci commented Jun 6, 2025

SGTM. Also cc @shukladivyansh to get a second eye on this as @cornellgit is OOO till next week.

Comment on lines +23 to +24
* The maintainers (committers) of this project are going to merge any changes in both implementations and interfaces without API stability concerns.
* Contributors are welcome to raise their PRs based on this policy, and incrementally improve code without worrying about API breakage.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Point 2 and 3 feel redundant with the first one.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit da346cf into google:main Jun 10, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants