-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
powerpc/ci: Add ppce500 machine to kernel+qemu workflows #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mpe
merged 1 commit into
linuxppc:merge
from
riteshharjani:support-ppce500-kernel+qemu-v2
Nov 8, 2025
Merged
powerpc/ci: Add ppce500 machine to kernel+qemu workflows #3
mpe
merged 1 commit into
linuxppc:merge
from
riteshharjani:support-ppce500-kernel+qemu-v2
Nov 8, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Recently we saw an issue with hugetlb max order folio pages. The warning was getting reported on ppc64e but the problem also existed on ppc32 for ppce500 machine type and e500mc cpu type for it's unconventional max order of folio for hugetlbfs. Hence enable kernel+qemu boot test with ppce500 machine as well to catch such corner case issues in future. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
Since blamed commit, unregister_netdevice_many_notify() takes the netdev
mutex if the device needs it.
If the device list is too long, this will lock more device mutexes than
lockdep can handle:
unshare -n \
bash -c 'for i in $(seq 1 100);do ip link add foo$i type dummy;done'
BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low!
turning off the locking correctness validator.
depth: 48 max: 48!
48 locks held by kworker/u16:1/69:
#0: ..148 ((wq_completion)netns){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work
#1: ..d40 (net_cleanup_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work
#2: ..bd0 (pernet_ops_rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: cleanup_net
#3: ..aa8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: default_device_exit_batch
#4: ..cb0 (&dev_instance_lock_key#3){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: unregister_netdevice_many_notify
[..]
Add a helper to close and then unlock a list of net_devices.
Devices that are not up have to be skipped - netif_close_many always
removes them from the list without any other actions taken, so they'd
remain in locked state.
Close devices whenever we've used up half of the tracking slots or we
processed entire list without hitting the limit.
Fixes: 7e4d784 ("net: hold netdev instance lock during rtnetlink operations")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
The original code causes a circular locking dependency found by lockdep. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.16.0-rc6-lgci-xe-xe-pw-151626v3+ #1 Tainted: G S U ------------------------------------------------------ xe_fault_inject/5091 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888156815688 ((work_completion)(&(&devcd->del_wk)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x25d/0x660 but task is already holding lock: ffff888156815620 (&devcd->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_coredump_put+0x3f/0xa0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&devcd->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: mutex_lock_nested+0x4e/0xc0 devcd_data_write+0x27/0x90 sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x80/0xf0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x169/0x220 vfs_write+0x293/0x560 ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2bf/0x2660 do_syscall_64+0x93/0xb60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (kn->active#236){++++}-{0:0}: kernfs_drain+0x1e2/0x200 __kernfs_remove+0xae/0x400 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5d/0xc0 remove_files+0x54/0x70 sysfs_remove_group+0x3d/0xa0 sysfs_remove_groups+0x2e/0x60 device_remove_attrs+0xc7/0x100 device_del+0x15d/0x3b0 devcd_del+0x19/0x30 process_one_work+0x22b/0x6f0 worker_thread+0x1e8/0x3d0 kthread+0x11c/0x250 ret_from_fork+0x26c/0x2e0 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&devcd->del_wk)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1661/0x2860 lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 __flush_work+0x27a/0x660 flush_delayed_work+0x5d/0xa0 dev_coredump_put+0x63/0xa0 xe_driver_devcoredump_fini+0x12/0x20 [xe] devm_action_release+0x12/0x30 release_nodes+0x3a/0x120 devres_release_all+0x8a/0xd0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x12/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x23a/0x280 device_driver_detach+0x14/0x20 unbind_store+0xaf/0xc0 drv_attr_store+0x21/0x50 sysfs_kf_write+0x4a/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x169/0x220 vfs_write+0x293/0x560 ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2bf/0x2660 do_syscall_64+0x93/0xb60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&devcd->del_wk)->work) --> kn->active#236 --> &devcd->mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&devcd->mutex); lock(kn->active#236); lock(&devcd->mutex); lock((work_completion)(&(&devcd->del_wk)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by xe_fault_inject/5091: #0: ffff8881129f9488 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 #1: ffff88810c755078 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x123/0x220 #2: ffff8881054811a0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x55/0x280 #3: ffff888156815620 (&devcd->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_coredump_put+0x3f/0xa0 #4: ffffffff8359e020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x72/0x660 stack backtrace: CPU: 14 UID: 0 PID: 5091 Comm: xe_fault_inject Tainted: G S U 6.16.0-rc6-lgci-xe-xe-pw-151626v3+ #1 PREEMPT_{RT,(lazy)} Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [U]=USER Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7D25/PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25), BIOS 1.10 12/13/2021 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 print_circular_bug+0x285/0x360 check_noncircular+0x135/0x150 ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x4a0 __lock_acquire+0x1661/0x2860 lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 ? __flush_work+0x25d/0x660 ? mark_held_locks+0x46/0x90 ? __flush_work+0x25d/0x660 __flush_work+0x27a/0x660 ? __flush_work+0x25d/0x660 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1e/0xd0 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 flush_delayed_work+0x5d/0xa0 dev_coredump_put+0x63/0xa0 xe_driver_devcoredump_fini+0x12/0x20 [xe] devm_action_release+0x12/0x30 release_nodes+0x3a/0x120 devres_release_all+0x8a/0xd0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x12/0x80 device_release_driver_internal+0x23a/0x280 ? bus_find_device+0xa8/0xe0 device_driver_detach+0x14/0x20 unbind_store+0xaf/0xc0 drv_attr_store+0x21/0x50 sysfs_kf_write+0x4a/0x80 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x169/0x220 vfs_write+0x293/0x560 ksys_write+0x72/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x19/0x30 x64_sys_call+0x2bf/0x2660 do_syscall_64+0x93/0xb60 ? __f_unlock_pos+0x15/0x20 ? __x64_sys_getdents64+0x9b/0x130 ? __pfx_filldir64+0x10/0x10 ? do_syscall_64+0x1a2/0xb60 ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x76e292edd574 Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d d5 ea 0e 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 48 89 RSP: 002b:00007fffe247a828 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000076e292edd574 RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: 00006267f6306063 RDI: 000000000000000b RBP: 000000000000000c R08: 000076e292fc4b20 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00006267f6306063 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00006267e6859c00 R15: 000076e29322a000 </TASK> xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Xe device coredump has been deleted. Fixes: 01daccf ("devcoredump : Serialize devcd_del work") Cc: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] # v6.1+ Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
On completion of i915_vma_pin_ww(), a synchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() is called. When pinning a VMA to GGTT address space on a Cherry View family processor, or on a Broxton generation SoC with VTD enabled, i.e., when stop_machine() is then called from intel_ggtt_bind_vma(), that can potentially lead to lock inversion among reservation_ww and cpu_hotplug locks. [86.861179] ====================================================== [86.861193] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [86.861209] 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ #1 Tainted: G U [86.861226] ------------------------------------------------------ [86.861238] i915_module_loa/1432 is trying to acquire lock: [86.861252] ffffffff83489090 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.861290] but task is already holding lock: [86.861303] ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.862233] which lock already depends on the new lock. [86.862251] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [86.862265] -> #5 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862292] dma_resv_lockdep+0x19a/0x390 [86.862315] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862334] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862353] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862369] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862383] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862399] -> #4 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [86.862425] dma_resv_lockdep+0x178/0x390 [86.862440] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862454] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862470] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862482] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862495] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862509] -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862531] down_read_killable+0x46/0x1e0 [86.862546] lock_mm_and_find_vma+0xa2/0x280 [86.862561] do_user_addr_fault+0x266/0x8e0 [86.862578] exc_page_fault+0x8a/0x2f0 [86.862593] asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [86.862607] filldir64+0xeb/0x180 [86.862620] kernfs_fop_readdir+0x118/0x480 [86.862635] iterate_dir+0xcf/0x2b0 [86.862648] __x64_sys_getdents64+0x84/0x140 [86.862661] x64_sys_call+0x1058/0x2660 [86.862675] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.862689] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.862703] -> #2 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862725] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [86.862738] kernfs_add_one+0x30/0x3c0 [86.862751] kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x53/0xb0 [86.862765] internal_create_group+0x134/0x4c0 [86.862779] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [86.862792] topology_add_dev+0x1d/0x30 [86.862806] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4b5/0x850 [86.862822] cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 [86.862836] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 [86.862852] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.862866] topology_sysfs_init+0x30/0x50 [86.862879] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862893] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862908] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862921] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862934] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862947] -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862969] __mutex_lock+0xaa/0xed0 [86.862982] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [86.862995] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 [86.863012] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.863026] page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 [86.863041] mm_core_init+0x22/0x2d0 [86.863054] start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 [86.863068] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 [86.863084] x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 [86.863098] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 [86.863114] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: [86.863135] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.863152] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.863166] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.863180] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.863194] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.863987] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.864735] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.865510] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.866248] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.866983] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.867719] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.868453] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.869228] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.870001] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.870774] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.871546] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.872330] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.873057] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.873782] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.873802] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.873817] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.873833] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.873848] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.873862] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.873876] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.873892] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.873904] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.873917] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.873931] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.873945] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.874678] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.875347] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.875369] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.875385] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.875398] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.875413] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.875426] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.875440] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.875454] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.875470] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.875486] other info that might help us debug this: [86.875502] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [86.875539] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [86.875552] CPU0 CPU1 [86.875563] ---- ---- [86.875573] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875588] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [86.875606] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875624] rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock); [86.875637] *** DEADLOCK *** [86.875650] 3 locks held by i915_module_loa/1432: [86.875663] #0: ffff888101f5c1b0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x104/0x220 [86.875699] #1: ffffc90002e0b4a0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.876512] #2: ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.877305] stack backtrace: [86.877326] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1432 Comm: i915_module_loa Tainted: G U 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [86.877334] Tainted: [U]=USER [86.877336] Hardware name: /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0079.2020.0420.1316 04/20/2020 [86.877339] Call Trace: [86.877344] <TASK> [86.877353] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0 [86.877364] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [86.877369] print_circular_bug+0x285/0x360 [86.877379] check_noncircular+0x135/0x150 [86.877390] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.877403] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.877408] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.877422] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878173] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.878182] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878191] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878916] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878927] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.879652] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.880375] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.881133] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.881851] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.882566] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.883286] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.884003] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.884756] ? i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x6c/0x1d0 [i915] [86.885513] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.886281] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.887049] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.887819] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.888587] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.889293] ? mutex_unlock+0x12/0x20 [86.889301] ? drm_privacy_screen_get+0x171/0x190 [86.889308] ? acpi_dev_found+0x66/0x80 [86.889321] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.890038] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.890049] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.890058] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.890067] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.890072] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.890078] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.890083] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [86.890088] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.890097] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.890101] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.890107] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.890113] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.890119] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.890833] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.891482] ? __pfx_i915_init+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.892135] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.892145] ? __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x33f/0x470 [86.892157] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.892164] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.892168] ? __kernel_read+0x15c/0x300 [86.892185] ? kernel_read_file+0x2b1/0x320 [86.892195] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892199] ? init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892211] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.892224] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.892230] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.892236] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.892243] ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0 [86.892249] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [86.892256] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.892261] RIP: 0033:0x7303e1b2725d [86.892271] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8b bb 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [86.892276] RSP: 002b:00007ffddd1fdb38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [86.892281] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005d771d88fd90 RCX: 00007303e1b2725d [86.892285] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005d771d893aa0 RDI: 000000000000000c [86.892287] RBP: 00007ffddd1fdbf0 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 00007ffddd1fdb80 [86.892289] R10: 00007303e1c03b20 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005d771d893aa0 [86.892292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005d771d88f0d0 R15: 00005d771d895710 [86.892304] </TASK> Call asynchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() in that case. v3: Provide more verbose in-line comment (Andi), - mention target environments in commit message. Fixes: 7d1c261 ("drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin.") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/14985 Cc: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 648ef13) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
Michael Chan says: ==================== bnxt_en: Bug fixes Patches 1, 3, and 4 are bug fixes related to the FW log tracing driver coredump feature recently added in 6.13. Patch #1 adds the necessary call to shutdown the FW logging DMA during PCI shutdown. Patch #3 fixes a possible null pointer derefernce when using early versions of the FW with this feature. Patch #4 adds the coredump header information unconditionally to make it more robust. Patch #2 fixes a possible memory leak during PTP shutdown. Patch #5 eliminates a dmesg warning when doing devlink reload. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
The following warning appears when running syzkaller, and this issue also exists in the mainline code. ------------[ cut here ]------------ list_add double add: new=ffffffffa57eee28, prev=ffffffffa57eee28, next=ffffffffa5e63100. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1491 at lib/list_debug.c:35 __list_add_valid_or_report+0xf7/0x130 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1491 Comm: syz.1.28 Not tainted 6.6.0+ #3 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0xf7/0x130 RSP: 0018:ff1100010dfb7b78 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffa57eee18 RCX: ffffffff97fc9817 RDX: 0000000000040000 RSI: ffa0000002383000 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffffffffa57eee28 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffe21c0021bf6f2c R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 6464615f7473696c R12: ffffffffa5e63100 R13: ffffffffa57eee28 R14: ffffffffa57eee28 R15: ff1100010dfb7d48 FS: 00007fb14398b640(0000) GS:ff11000119600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000010d096005 CR4: 0000000000773ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 80000000 Call Trace: <TASK> input_register_handler+0xb3/0x210 mac_hid_start_emulation+0x1c5/0x290 mac_hid_toggle_emumouse+0x20a/0x240 proc_sys_call_handler+0x4c2/0x6e0 new_sync_write+0x1b1/0x2d0 vfs_write+0x709/0x950 ksys_write+0x12a/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2 The WARNING occurs when two processes concurrently write to the mac-hid emulation sysctl, causing a race condition in mac_hid_toggle_emumouse(). Both processes read old_val=0, then both try to register the input handler, leading to a double list_add of the same handler. CPU0 CPU1 ------------------------- ------------------------- vfs_write() //write 1 vfs_write() //write 1 proc_sys_write() proc_sys_write() mac_hid_toggle_emumouse() mac_hid_toggle_emumouse() old_val = *valp // old_val=0 old_val = *valp // old_val=0 mutex_lock_killable() proc_dointvec() // *valp=1 mac_hid_start_emulation() input_register_handler() mutex_unlock() mutex_lock_killable() proc_dointvec() mac_hid_start_emulation() input_register_handler() //Trigger Warning mutex_unlock() Fix this by moving the old_val read inside the mutex lock region. Fixes: 99b089c ("Input: Mac button emulation - implement as an input filter") Signed-off-by: Long Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
sourabhjains
pushed a commit
to sourabhjains/linux-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2025
Expand the prefault memory selftest to add a regression test for a KVM bug where KVM's retry logic would result in (breakable) deadlock due to the memslot deletion waiting on prefaulting to release SRCU, and prefaulting waiting on the memslot to fully disappear (KVM uses a two-step process to delete memslots, and KVM x86 retries page faults if a to-be-deleted, a.k.a. INVALID, memslot is encountered). To exercise concurrent memslot remove, spawn a second thread to initiate memslot removal at roughly the same time as prefaulting. Test memslot removal for all testcases, i.e. don't limit concurrent removal to only the success case. There are essentially three prefault scenarios (so far) that are of interest: 1. Success 2. ENOENT due to no memslot 3. EAGAIN due to INVALID memslot For all intents and purposes, linuxppc#1 and linuxppc#2 are mutually exclusive, or rather, easier to test via separate testcases since writing to non-existent memory is trivial. But for linuxppc#3, making it mutually exclusive with linuxppc#1 _or_ linuxppc#2 is actually more complex than testing memslot removal for all scenarios. The only requirement to let memslot removal coexist with other scenarios is a way to guarantee a stable result, e.g. that the "no memslot" test observes ENOENT, not EAGAIN, for the final checks. So, rather than make memslot removal mutually exclusive with the ENOENT scenario, simply restore the memslot and retry prefaulting. For the "no memslot" case, KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY should be idempotent, i.e. should always fail with ENOENT regardless of how many times userspace attempts prefaulting. Pass in both the base GPA and the offset (instead of the "full" GPA) so that the worker can recreate the memslot. Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
Leon Hwang says: ==================== In the discussion thread "[PATCH bpf-next v9 0/7] bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps"[1], it was pointed out that missing calls to bpf_obj_free_fields() could lead to memory leaks. A selftest was added to confirm that this is indeed a real issue - the refcount of BPF_KPTR_REF field is not decremented when bpf_obj_free_fields() is missing after copy_map_value[,_long](). Further inspection of copy_map_value[,_long]() call sites revealed two locations affected by this issue: 1. pcpu_copy_value() 2. htab_map_update_elem() when used with BPF_F_LOCK Similar case happens when update local storage maps with BPF_F_LOCK. This series fixes the cases where BPF_F_LOCK is not involved by properly calling bpf_obj_free_fields() after copy_map_value[,_long](), and adds a selftest to verify the fix. The remaining cases involving BPF_F_LOCK will be addressed in a separate patch set after the series "bpf: Introduce BPF_F_CPU and BPF_F_ALL_CPUS flags for percpu maps" is applied. Changes: v5 -> v6: * Update the test name to include "refcounted_kptr". * Update some local variables' name in the test (per Alexei). * v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ v4 -> v5: * Use a local variable to store the this_cpu_ptr()/per_cpu_ptr() result, and reuse it between copy_map_value[,_long]() and bpf_obj_free_fields() in patch linuxppc#1 (per Andrii). * Drop patch linuxppc#2 and linuxppc#3, because the combination of BPF_F_LOCK with other special fields (except for BPF_SPIN_LOCK) will be disallowed on the UAPI side in the future (per Alexei). * v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ v3 -> v4: * Target bpf-next tree. * Address comments from Amery: * Drop 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' in the path of updating local storage maps without BPF_F_LOCK. * Drop the corresponding self test. * Respin the other test of local storage maps using syscall BPF programs. * v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ v2 -> v3: * Free special fields when update local storage maps without BPF_F_LOCK. * Add test to verify decrementing refcount when update cgroup local storage maps without BPF_F_LOCK. * Address review from AI bot: * Slow path with BPF_F_LOCK (around line 642-646) in 'bpf_local_storage.c'. * v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ v1 -> v2: * Add test to verify decrementing refcount when update cgroup local storage maps with BPF_F_LOCK. * Address review from AI bot: * Fast path without bucket lock (around line 610) in 'bpf_local_storage.c'. * v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
maddy-kerneldev
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
Add VMX exit handlers for SEAMCALL and TDCALL to inject a #UD if a non-TD guest attempts to execute SEAMCALL or TDCALL. Neither SEAMCALL nor TDCALL is gated by any software enablement other than VMXON, and so will generate a VM-Exit instead of e.g. a native #UD when executed from the guest kernel. Note! No unprivileged DoS of the L1 kernel is possible as TDCALL and SEAMCALL #GP at CPL > 0, and the CPL check is performed prior to the VMX non-root (VM-Exit) check, i.e. userspace can't crash the VM. And for a nested guest, KVM forwards unknown exits to L1, i.e. an L2 kernel can crash itself, but not L1. Note #2! The Intel® Trust Domain CPU Architectural Extensions spec's pseudocode shows the CPL > 0 check for SEAMCALL coming _after_ the VM-Exit, but that appears to be a documentation bug (likely because the CPL > 0 check was incorrectly bundled with other lower-priority #GP checks). Testing on SPR and EMR shows that the CPL > 0 check is performed before the VMX non-root check, i.e. SEAMCALL #GPs when executed in usermode. Note #3! The aforementioned Trust Domain spec uses confusing pseudocode that says that SEAMCALL will #UD if executed "inSEAM", but "inSEAM" specifically means in SEAM Root Mode, i.e. in the TDX-Module. The long- form description explicitly states that SEAMCALL generates an exit when executed in "SEAM VMX non-root operation". But that's a moot point as the TDX-Module injects #UD if the guest attempts to execute SEAMCALL, as documented in the "Unconditionally Blocked Instructions" section of the TDX-Module base specification. Cc: [email protected] Cc: Kai Huang <[email protected]> Cc: Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <[email protected]> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> Cc: Binbin Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Binbin Wu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2025
On completion of i915_vma_pin_ww(), a synchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() is called. When pinning a VMA to GGTT address space on a Cherry View family processor, or on a Broxton generation SoC with VTD enabled, i.e., when stop_machine() is then called from intel_ggtt_bind_vma(), that can potentially lead to lock inversion among reservation_ww and cpu_hotplug locks. [86.861179] ====================================================== [86.861193] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [86.861209] 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ linuxppc#1 Tainted: G U [86.861226] ------------------------------------------------------ [86.861238] i915_module_loa/1432 is trying to acquire lock: [86.861252] ffffffff83489090 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.861290] but task is already holding lock: [86.861303] ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.862233] which lock already depends on the new lock. [86.862251] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [86.862265] -> #5 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862292] dma_resv_lockdep+0x19a/0x390 [86.862315] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862334] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862353] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862369] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862383] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862399] -> linuxppc#4 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [86.862425] dma_resv_lockdep+0x178/0x390 [86.862440] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862454] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862470] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862482] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862495] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862509] -> linuxppc#3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862531] down_read_killable+0x46/0x1e0 [86.862546] lock_mm_and_find_vma+0xa2/0x280 [86.862561] do_user_addr_fault+0x266/0x8e0 [86.862578] exc_page_fault+0x8a/0x2f0 [86.862593] asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [86.862607] filldir64+0xeb/0x180 [86.862620] kernfs_fop_readdir+0x118/0x480 [86.862635] iterate_dir+0xcf/0x2b0 [86.862648] __x64_sys_getdents64+0x84/0x140 [86.862661] x64_sys_call+0x1058/0x2660 [86.862675] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.862689] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.862703] -> linuxppc#2 (&root->kernfs_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [86.862725] down_write+0x3e/0xf0 [86.862738] kernfs_add_one+0x30/0x3c0 [86.862751] kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x53/0xb0 [86.862765] internal_create_group+0x134/0x4c0 [86.862779] sysfs_create_group+0x13/0x20 [86.862792] topology_add_dev+0x1d/0x30 [86.862806] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4b5/0x850 [86.862822] cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 [86.862836] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 [86.862852] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.862866] topology_sysfs_init+0x30/0x50 [86.862879] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.862893] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cd/0x680 [86.862908] kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 [86.862921] ret_from_fork+0x47/0x70 [86.862934] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [86.862947] -> linuxppc#1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [86.862969] __mutex_lock+0xaa/0xed0 [86.862982] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [86.862995] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 [86.863012] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 [86.863026] page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 [86.863041] mm_core_init+0x22/0x2d0 [86.863054] start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 [86.863068] x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 [86.863084] x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 [86.863098] common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 [86.863114] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: [86.863135] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.863152] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.863166] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.863180] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.863194] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.863987] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.864735] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.865510] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.866248] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.866983] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.867719] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.868453] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.869228] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.870001] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.870774] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.871546] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.872330] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.873057] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.873782] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.873802] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.873817] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.873833] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.873848] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.873862] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.873876] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.873892] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.873904] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.873917] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.873931] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.873945] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.874678] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.875347] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.875369] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.875385] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.875398] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.875413] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.875426] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.875440] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.875454] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.875470] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.875486] other info that might help us debug this: [86.875502] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> reservation_ww_class_acquire --> reservation_ww_class_mutex [86.875539] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [86.875552] CPU0 CPU1 [86.875563] ---- ---- [86.875573] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875588] lock(reservation_ww_class_acquire); [86.875606] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [86.875624] rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock); [86.875637] *** DEADLOCK *** [86.875650] 3 locks held by i915_module_loa/1432: [86.875663] #0: ffff888101f5c1b0 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x104/0x220 [86.875699] linuxppc#1: ffffc90002e0b4a0 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.876512] linuxppc#2: ffffc90002e0b4c8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x39/0x1d0 [i915] [86.877305] stack backtrace: [86.877326] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1432 Comm: i915_module_loa Tainted: G U 6.15.0-rc5-CI_DRM_16515-gca0305cadc2d+ linuxppc#1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [86.877334] Tainted: [U]=USER [86.877336] Hardware name: /NUC5CPYB, BIOS PYBSWCEL.86A.0079.2020.0420.1316 04/20/2020 [86.877339] Call Trace: [86.877344] <TASK> [86.877353] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xf0 [86.877364] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [86.877369] print_circular_bug+0x285/0x360 [86.877379] check_noncircular+0x135/0x150 [86.877390] __lock_acquire+0x1635/0x2810 [86.877403] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2f0 [86.877408] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.877422] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878173] cpus_read_lock+0x41/0x100 [86.878182] ? stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878191] ? __pfx_bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__cb+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.878916] stop_machine+0x1c/0x50 [86.878927] bxt_vtd_ggtt_insert_entries__BKL+0x3b/0x60 [i915] [86.879652] intel_ggtt_bind_vma+0x43/0x70 [i915] [86.880375] __vma_bind+0x55/0x70 [i915] [86.881133] fence_work+0x26/0xa0 [i915] [86.881851] fence_notify+0xa1/0x140 [i915] [86.882566] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8f/0x270 [i915] [86.883286] i915_sw_fence_commit+0x39/0x60 [i915] [86.884003] i915_vma_pin_ww+0x462/0x1360 [i915] [86.884756] ? i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x6c/0x1d0 [i915] [86.885513] i915_vma_pin.constprop.0+0x133/0x1d0 [i915] [86.886281] initial_plane_vma+0x307/0x840 [i915] [86.887049] intel_initial_plane_config+0x33f/0x670 [i915] [86.887819] intel_display_driver_probe_nogem+0x1c6/0x260 [i915] [86.888587] i915_driver_probe+0x7fa/0xe80 [i915] [86.889293] ? mutex_unlock+0x12/0x20 [86.889301] ? drm_privacy_screen_get+0x171/0x190 [86.889308] ? acpi_dev_found+0x66/0x80 [86.889321] i915_pci_probe+0xe6/0x220 [i915] [86.890038] local_pci_probe+0x47/0xb0 [86.890049] pci_device_probe+0xf3/0x260 [86.890058] really_probe+0xf1/0x3c0 [86.890067] __driver_probe_device+0x8c/0x180 [86.890072] driver_probe_device+0x24/0xd0 [86.890078] __driver_attach+0x10f/0x220 [86.890083] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [86.890088] bus_for_each_dev+0x7f/0xe0 [86.890097] driver_attach+0x1e/0x30 [86.890101] bus_add_driver+0x151/0x290 [86.890107] driver_register+0x5e/0x130 [86.890113] __pci_register_driver+0x7d/0x90 [86.890119] i915_pci_register_driver+0x23/0x30 [i915] [86.890833] i915_init+0x37/0x120 [i915] [86.891482] ? __pfx_i915_init+0x10/0x10 [i915] [86.892135] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x3f0 [86.892145] ? __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x33f/0x470 [86.892157] do_init_module+0x97/0x2a0 [86.892164] load_module+0x2c54/0x2d80 [86.892168] ? __kernel_read+0x15c/0x300 [86.892185] ? kernel_read_file+0x2b1/0x320 [86.892195] init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892199] ? init_module_from_file+0x96/0xe0 [86.892211] idempotent_init_module+0x117/0x330 [86.892224] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x77/0x100 [86.892230] x64_sys_call+0x24de/0x2660 [86.892236] do_syscall_64+0x91/0xe90 [86.892243] ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0 [86.892249] ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x57/0xc0 [86.892256] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [86.892261] RIP: 0033:0x7303e1b2725d [86.892271] Code: ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8b bb 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [86.892276] RSP: 002b:00007ffddd1fdb38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [86.892281] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005d771d88fd90 RCX: 00007303e1b2725d [86.892285] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005d771d893aa0 RDI: 000000000000000c [86.892287] RBP: 00007ffddd1fdbf0 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 00007ffddd1fdb80 [86.892289] R10: 00007303e1c03b20 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005d771d893aa0 [86.892292] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00005d771d88f0d0 R15: 00005d771d895710 [86.892304] </TASK> Call asynchronous variant of dma_fence_work_commit() in that case. v3: Provide more verbose in-line comment (Andi), - mention target environments in commit message. Fixes: 7d1c261 ("drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin.") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/14985 Cc: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Brzezinka <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.18, take linuxppc#3 - Only adjust the ID registers when no irqchip has been created once per VM run, instead of doing it once per vcpu, as this otherwise triggers a pretty bad conbsistency check failure in the sysreg code. - Make sure the per-vcpu Fine Grain Traps are computed before we load the system registers on the HW, as we otherwise start running without anything set until the first preemption of the vcpu.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
When a large VM, specifically one that holds a significant number of PTEs, gets abruptly destroyed, the following warning is seen during the page-table walk: sched: CPU 0 need_resched set for > 100018840 ns (100 ticks) without schedule CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 9617 Comm: kvm_page_table_ Tainted: G O 6.16.0-smp-DEV linuxppc#3 NONE Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Call trace: show_stack+0x20/0x38 (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x3c/0xb8 dump_stack+0x18/0x30 resched_latency_warn+0x7c/0x88 sched_tick+0x1c4/0x268 update_process_times+0xa8/0xd8 tick_nohz_handler+0xc8/0x168 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x11c/0x338 hrtimer_interrupt+0x104/0x308 arch_timer_handler_phys+0x40/0x58 handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x1b0 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x48/0x78 gic_handle_irq+0x1b8/0x408 call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x30 do_interrupt_handler+0x54/0x78 el1_interrupt+0x44/0x88 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28 el1h_64_irq+0x84/0x88 stage2_free_walker+0x30/0xa0 (P) __kvm_pgtable_walk+0x11c/0x258 __kvm_pgtable_walk+0x180/0x258 __kvm_pgtable_walk+0x180/0x258 __kvm_pgtable_walk+0x180/0x258 kvm_pgtable_walk+0xc4/0x140 kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy+0x5c/0xf0 kvm_free_stage2_pgd+0x6c/0xe8 kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu+0x24/0x48 kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all+0x80/0xa0 kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x38/0x78 __mmu_notifier_release+0x15c/0x250 exit_mmap+0x68/0x400 __mmput+0x38/0x1c8 mmput+0x30/0x68 exit_mm+0xd4/0x198 do_exit+0x1a4/0xb00 do_group_exit+0x8c/0x120 get_signal+0x6d4/0x778 do_signal+0x90/0x718 do_notify_resume+0x70/0x170 el0_svc+0x74/0xd8 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x60/0xc8 el0t_64_sync+0x1b0/0x1b8 The warning is seen majorly on the host kernels that are configured not to force-preempt, such as CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y. To avoid this, instead of walking the entire page-table in one go, split it into smaller ranges, by checking for cond_resched() between each range. Since the path is executed during VM destruction, after the page-table structure is unlinked from the KVM MMU, relying on cond_resched_rwlock_write() isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
For some reason, of_find_node_with_property() is creating a spinlock recursion issue along with fwnode_count_parents(), and this issue is making all MediaTek boards unbootable. As of kernel v6.18-rc6, there are only three users of this function, one of which is this driver. Migrate away from of_find_node_with_property() by adding a local scpsys_get_legacy_regmap_node() function, which acts similarly to of_find_node_with_property(), and calling the former in place of the latter. This resolves the following spinlock recursion issue: [ 1.773979] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, kworker/u24:1/60 [ 1.790485] lock: devtree_lock+0x0/0x40, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u24:1/60, .owner_cpu: 2 [ 1.791644] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 60 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted: G W 6.18.0-rc6 linuxppc#3 PREEMPT [ 1.791649] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 1.791650] Hardware name: MediaTek Genio-510 EVK (DT) [ 1.791653] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 1.791658] Call trace: [ 1.791659] show_stack+0x18/0x30 (C) [ 1.791664] dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x94 [ 1.791668] dump_stack+0x18/0x24 [ 1.791672] spin_dump+0x78/0x88 [ 1.791678] do_raw_spin_lock+0x110/0x140 [ 1.791684] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x6c [ 1.791690] of_get_parent+0x28/0x74 [ 1.791694] of_fwnode_get_parent+0x38/0x7c [ 1.791700] fwnode_count_parents+0x34/0xf0 [ 1.791705] fwnode_full_name_string+0x28/0x120 [ 1.791710] device_node_string+0x3e4/0x50c [ 1.791715] pointer+0x294/0x430 [ 1.791718] vsnprintf+0x21c/0x5bc [ 1.791722] vprintk_store+0x108/0x47c [ 1.791728] vprintk_emit+0xc4/0x350 [ 1.791732] vprintk_default+0x34/0x40 [ 1.791736] vprintk+0x24/0x30 [ 1.791740] _printk+0x60/0x8c [ 1.791744] of_node_release+0x154/0x194 [ 1.791749] kobject_put+0xa0/0x120 [ 1.791753] of_node_put+0x18/0x28 [ 1.791756] of_find_node_with_property+0x74/0x100 [ 1.791761] scpsys_probe+0x338/0x5e0 [ 1.791765] platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4 [ 1.791770] really_probe+0xbc/0x2ac [ 1.791774] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x118 [ 1.791779] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x170 [ 1.791783] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x150 [ 1.791788] bus_for_each_drv+0x88/0xe8 [ 1.791792] __device_attach+0x9c/0x1a0 [ 1.791796] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20 [ 1.791801] bus_probe_device+0xa0/0xa4 [ 1.791805] deferred_probe_work_func+0x88/0xd0 [ 1.791809] process_one_work+0x1e8/0x448 [ 1.791813] worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340 [ 1.791816] kthread+0x138/0x220 [ 1.791821] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Fixes: c29345f ("pmdomain: mediatek: Refactor bus protection regmaps retrieval") Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Tested-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <[email protected]> Tested-by: Macpaul Lin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Macpaul Lin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2025
Commit bf454ec ("kexec_file: allow to place kexec_buf randomly") introduced the kexec_buf->random field to enable random placement of kexec_buf. However, this field was never properly initialized for kexec images that do not need to be placed randomly, leading to the following UBSAN warning: [ +0.364528] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ +0.000019] UBSAN: invalid-load in ./include/linux/kexec.h:210:12 [ +0.000131] load of value 2 is not a valid value for type 'bool' (aka '_Bool') [ +0.000003] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 927 Comm: kexec Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7+ linuxppc#3 PREEMPT(full) [ +0.000002] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ +0.000000] Call trace: [ +0.000001] show_stack+0x24/0x40 (C) [ +0.000006] __dump_stack+0x28/0x48 [ +0.000002] dump_stack_lvl+0x7c/0xb0 [ +0.000002] dump_stack+0x18/0x34 [ +0.000001] ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x50 [ +0.000002] __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0xc8/0xd0 [ +0.000003] locate_mem_hole_callback+0x28c/0x2a0 [ +0.000003] kexec_locate_mem_hole+0xf4/0x2f0 [ +0.000001] kexec_add_buffer+0xa8/0x178 [ +0.000002] image_load+0xf0/0x258 [ +0.000001] __arm64_sys_kexec_file_load+0x510/0x718 [ +0.000002] invoke_syscall+0x68/0xe8 [ +0.000001] el0_svc_common+0xb0/0xf8 [ +0.000002] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x48 [ +0.000001] el0_svc+0x40/0xe8 [ +0.000002] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x140 [ +0.000002] el0t_64_sync+0x1bc/0x1c0 To address this, initialise kexec_buf->random field properly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: bf454ec ("kexec_file: allow to place kexec_buf randomly") Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <[email protected]> Cc: Baoquan He <[email protected]> Cc: Breno Leitao <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Coiby Xu <[email protected]> Cc: levi.yun <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Jan Pazdziora <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2025
Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> says: Similarly to how CAN FD reuses the bittiming logic of Classical CAN, CAN XL also reuses the entirety of CAN FD features, and, on top of that, adds new features which are specific to CAN XL. A so-called 'mixed-mode' is intended to have (XL-tolerant) CAN FD nodes and CAN XL nodes on one CAN segment, where the FD-controllers can talk CC/FD and the XL-controllers can talk CC/FD/XL. This mixed-mode utilizes the known error-signalling (ES) for sending CC/FD/XL frames. For CAN FD and CAN XL the tranceiver delay compensation (TDC) is supported to use common CAN and CAN-SIG transceivers. The CANXL-only mode disables the error-signalling in the CAN XL controller. This mode does not allow CC/FD frames to be sent but additionally offers a CAN XL transceiver mode switching (TMS) to send CAN XL frames with up to 20Mbit/s data rate. The TMS utilizes a PWM configuration which is added to the netlink interface. Configured with CAN_CTRLMODE_FD and CAN_CTRLMODE_XL this leads to: FD=0 XL=0 CC-only mode (ES=1) FD=1 XL=0 FD/CC mixed-mode (ES=1) FD=1 XL=1 XL/FD/CC mixed-mode (ES=1) FD=0 XL=1 XL-only mode (ES=0, TMS optional) Patch linuxppc#1 print defined ctrlmode strings capitalized to increase the readability and to be in line with the 'ip' tool (iproute2). Patch linuxppc#2 is a small clean-up which makes can_calc_bittiming() use NL_SET_ERR_MSG() instead of netdev_err(). Patch linuxppc#3 adds a check in can_dev_dropped_skb() to drop CAN FD frames when CAN FD is turned off. Patch linuxppc#4 adds CAN_CTRLMODE_RESTRICTED. Note that contrary to the other CAN_CTRL_MODE_XL_* that are introduced in the later patches, this control mode is not specific to CAN XL. The nuance is that because this restricted mode was only added in ISO 11898-1:2024, it is made mandatory for CAN XL devices but optional for other protocols. This is why this patch is added as a preparation before introducing the core CAN XL logic. Patch #5 adds all the CAN XL features which are inherited from CAN FD: the nominal bittiming, the data bittiming and the TDC. Patch #6 add a new CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TMS control mode which is specific to CAN XL to enable the transceiver mode switching (TMS) in XL-only mode. Patch #7 adds a check in can_dev_dropped_skb() to drop CAN CC/FD frames when the CAN XL controller is in CAN XL-only mode. The introduced can_dev_in_xl_only_mode() function also determines the error-signalling configuration for the CAN XL controllers. Patch #8 to #11 add the PWM logic for the CAN XL TMS mode. Patch #12 to #14 add different default sample-points for standard CAN and CAN SIG transceivers (with TDC) and CAN XL transceivers using PWM in the CAN XL TMS mode. Patch #15 add a dummy_can driver for netlink testing and debugging. Patch #16 check CAN frame type (CC/FD/XL) when writing those frames to the CAN_RAW socket and reject them if it's not supported by the CAN interface. Patch #17 increase the resolution when printing the bitrate error and round-up the value to 0.01% in the case the resolution would still provide values which would lead to 0.00%. Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2025
It's possible that the auxiliary proxy device we add when setting up the
GPIO controller exposing shared pins, will get matched and probed
immediately. The gpio-proxy-driver will then retrieve the shared
descriptor structure. That will cause a recursive mutex locking and
a deadlock because we're already holding the gpio_shared_lock in
gpio_device_setup_shared() and try to take it again in
devm_gpiod_shared_get() like this:
[ 4.298346] gpiolib_shared: GPIO 130 owned by f100000.pinctrl is shared by multiple consumers
[ 4.307157] gpiolib_shared: Setting up a shared GPIO entry for speaker@0,3
[ 4.314604]
[ 4.316146] ============================================
[ 4.321600] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 4.327054] 6.18.0-rc7-next-20251125-g3f300d0674f6-dirty #3887 Not tainted
[ 4.334115] --------------------------------------------
[ 4.339566] kworker/u32:3/71 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 4.344931] ffffda019ba71850 (gpio_shared_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: devm_gpiod_shared_get+0x34/0x2e0
[ 4.354057]
[ 4.354057] but task is already holding lock:
[ 4.360041] ffffda019ba71850 (gpio_shared_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: gpio_device_setup_shared+0x30/0x268
[ 4.369421]
[ 4.369421] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 4.376126] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 4.376126]
[ 4.382198] CPU0
[ 4.384711] ----
[ 4.387223] lock(gpio_shared_lock);
[ 4.390992] lock(gpio_shared_lock);
[ 4.394761]
[ 4.394761] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 4.394761]
[ 4.400832] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 4.400832]
[ 4.407802] 5 locks held by kworker/u32:3/71:
[ 4.412279] #0: ffff000080020948 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x194/0x64c
[ 4.422650] linuxppc#1: ffff800080963d60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x64c
[ 4.432117] linuxppc#2: ffff00008165c8f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach+0x3c/0x198
[ 4.440700] linuxppc#3: ffffda019ba71850 (gpio_shared_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: gpio_device_setup_shared+0x30/0x268
[ 4.450523] linuxppc#4: ffff0000810fe918 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach+0x3c/0x198
[ 4.459103]
[ 4.459103] stack backtrace:
[ 4.463581] CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 71 Comm: kworker/u32:3 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc7-next-20251125-g3f300d0674f6-dirty #3887 PREEMPT
[ 4.463589] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Robotics RB5 (DT)
[ 4.463593] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[ 4.463602] Call trace:
[ 4.463604] show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C)
[ 4.463617] dump_stack_lvl+0x70/0x98
[ 4.463627] dump_stack+0x18/0x24
[ 4.463636] print_deadlock_bug+0x224/0x238
[ 4.463643] __lock_acquire+0xe4c/0x15f0
[ 4.463648] lock_acquire+0x1cc/0x344
[ 4.463653] __mutex_lock+0xb8/0x840
[ 4.463661] mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30
[ 4.463667] devm_gpiod_shared_get+0x34/0x2e0
[ 4.463674] gpio_shared_proxy_probe+0x18/0x138
[ 4.463682] auxiliary_bus_probe+0x40/0x78
[ 4.463688] really_probe+0xbc/0x2c0
[ 4.463694] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120
[ 4.463701] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x160
[ 4.463708] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140
[ 4.463716] bus_for_each_drv+0x88/0xe8
[ 4.463723] __device_attach+0xa0/0x198
[ 4.463729] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
[ 4.463737] bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc0
[ 4.463743] device_add+0x578/0x76c
[ 4.463747] __auxiliary_device_add+0x40/0xac
[ 4.463752] gpio_device_setup_shared+0x1f8/0x268
[ 4.463758] gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0xdac/0x10ac
[ 4.463763] devm_gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x30/0x80
[ 4.463768] msm_pinctrl_probe+0x4b0/0x5e0
[ 4.463779] sm8250_pinctrl_probe+0x18/0x40
[ 4.463784] platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4
[ 4.463793] really_probe+0xbc/0x2c0
[ 4.463800] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x120
[ 4.463807] driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x160
[ 4.463814] __device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x140
[ 4.463821] bus_for_each_drv+0x88/0xe8
[ 4.463827] __device_attach+0xa0/0x198
[ 4.463834] device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
[ 4.463841] bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc0
[ 4.463847] deferred_probe_work_func+0x90/0xcc
[ 4.463854] process_one_work+0x214/0x64c
[ 4.463860] worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
[ 4.463866] kthread+0x14c/0x220
[ 4.463871] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 77.265041] random: crng init done
Fortunately, at the time of creating of the auxiliary device, we already
know the correct entry so let's store it as the device's platform data.
We don't need to hold gpio_shared_lock in devm_gpiod_shared_get() as
we're not removing the entry or traversing the list anymore but we still
need to protect it from concurrent modification of its fields so add a
more fine-grained mutex.
Fixes: a060b8c ("gpiolib: implement low-level, shared GPIO support")
Reported-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fimuvblfy2cmn7o4wzcxjzrux5mwhvlvyxfsgeqs6ore2xg75i@ax46d3sfmdux/
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
mpe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2025
The U-Blox EVK-M101 enumerates as 1546:0506 [1] with four FTDI interfaces: - EVK-M101 current sensors - EVK-M101 I2C - EVK-M101 UART - EVK-M101 port D Only the third USB interface is a UART. This change lets ftdi_sio probe the VID/PID and registers only interface #3 as a TTY, leaving the rest available for other drivers. [1] usb 5-1.3: new high-speed USB device number 11 using xhci_hcd usb 5-1.3: New USB device found, idVendor=1546, idProduct=0506, bcdDevice= 8.00 usb 5-1.3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 usb 5-1.3: Product: EVK-M101 usb 5-1.3: Manufacturer: u-blox AG Datasheet: https://content.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/documents/EVK-M10_UserGuide_UBX-21003949.pdf Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]/ Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2025
…ockdep While developing IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT support for the code under fs/smb/common/smbdirect [1], I noticed false positives like this: [T79] ====================================================== [T79] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [T79] 6.18.0-rc4-metze-kasan-lockdep.01+ linuxppc#1 Tainted: G OE [T79] ------------------------------------------------------ [T79] kworker/2:0/79 is trying to acquire lock: [T79] ffff88801f968278 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] but task is already holding lock: [T79] ffffffffc10f7230 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_listen+0x3d2/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] which lock already depends on the new lock. [T79] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [T79] -> linuxppc#1 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}: [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] __mutex_lock+0x1af/0x1c10 [T79] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [T79] cma_get_port+0xba/0x7d0 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_bind_addr_dst+0x598/0x9a0 [rdma_cm] [T79] cma_bind_addr+0x107/0x320 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_resolve_addr+0xa3/0x830 [rdma_cm] [T79] destroy_lease_table+0x12b/0x420 [ksmbd] [T79] ksmbd_NTtimeToUnix+0x3e/0x80 [ksmbd] [T79] ndr_encode_posix_acl+0x6e9/0xab0 [ksmbd] [T79] ndr_encode_v4_ntacl+0x53/0x870 [ksmbd] [T79] __sys_connect_file+0x131/0x1c0 [T79] __sys_connect+0x111/0x140 [T79] __x64_sys_connect+0x72/0xc0 [T79] x64_sys_call+0xe7d/0x26a0 [T79] do_syscall_64+0x93/0xff0 [T79] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [T79] -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}: [T79] check_prev_add+0xf3/0xcd0 [T79] validate_chain+0x466/0x590 [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [T79] sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] siw_create_listen+0x145/0x1540 [siw] [T79] iw_cm_listen+0x313/0x5b0 [iw_cm] [T79] cma_iw_listen+0x271/0x3c0 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x3b1/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] cma_listen_on_dev+0x46a/0x750 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x4b0/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ksmbd_rdma_init+0x12b/0x270 [ksmbd] [T79] ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x26/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] server_ctrl_handle_work+0x1e5/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] process_one_work+0x86c/0x1930 [T79] worker_thread+0x6f0/0x11f0 [T79] kthread+0x3ec/0x8b0 [T79] ret_from_fork+0x314/0x400 [T79] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [T79] other info that might help us debug this: [T79] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [T79] CPU0 CPU1 [T79] ---- ---- [T79] lock(lock#9); [T79] lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); [T79] lock(lock#9); [T79] lock(sk_lock-AF_INET); [T79] *** DEADLOCK *** [T79] 5 locks held by kworker/2:0/79: [T79] #0: ffff88800120b158 ((wq_completion)events_long){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xfca/0x1930 [T79] linuxppc#1: ffffc9000474fd00 ((work_completion)(&ctrl->ctrl_work)) {+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x804/0x1930 [T79] linuxppc#2: ffffffffc11307d0 (ctrl_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: server_ctrl_handle_work+0x21/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] linuxppc#3: ffffffffc11347b0 (init_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x18/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] linuxppc#4: ffffffffc10f7230 (lock#9){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rdma_listen+0x3d2/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] stack backtrace: [T79] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kworker/2:0 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 6.18.0-rc4-metze-kasan-lockdep.01+ linuxppc#1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [T79] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [T79] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [T79] Workqueue: events_long server_ctrl_handle_work [ksmbd] ... [T79] print_circular_bug+0xfd/0x130 [T79] check_noncircular+0x150/0x170 [T79] check_prev_add+0xf3/0xcd0 [T79] validate_chain+0x466/0x590 [T79] __lock_acquire+0x535/0xc30 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] lock_acquire.part.0+0xb3/0x240 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? apparmor_socket_post_create+0x180/0x700 [T79] lock_acquire+0x60/0x140 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [T79] ? sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] sock_set_reuseaddr+0x14/0x70 [T79] siw_create_listen+0x145/0x1540 [siw] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? local_clock_noinstr+0xe/0xd0 [T79] ? __pfx_siw_create_listen+0x10/0x10 [siw] [T79] ? trace_preempt_on+0x4c/0x130 [T79] ? __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4a/0x90 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? preempt_count_sub+0x52/0x80 [T79] iw_cm_listen+0x313/0x5b0 [iw_cm] [T79] cma_iw_listen+0x271/0x3c0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] rdma_listen+0x3b1/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x60 [T79] ? __pfx_rdma_listen+0x10/0x10 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? rdma_restrack_add+0x12c/0x630 [ib_core] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] cma_listen_on_dev+0x46a/0x750 [rdma_cm] [T79] rdma_listen+0x4b0/0x740 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? __pfx_rdma_listen+0x10/0x10 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? cma_get_port+0x30d/0x7d0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? rdma_bind_addr_dst+0x598/0x9a0 [rdma_cm] [T79] ksmbd_rdma_init+0x12b/0x270 [ksmbd] [T79] ? __pfx_ksmbd_rdma_init+0x10/0x10 [ksmbd] [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? register_netdevice_notifier+0x1dc/0x240 [T79] ksmbd_conn_transport_init+0x26/0x70 [ksmbd] [T79] server_ctrl_handle_work+0x1e5/0x280 [ksmbd] [T79] process_one_work+0x86c/0x1930 [T79] ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10 [T79] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [T79] ? assign_work+0x16f/0x280 [T79] worker_thread+0x6f0/0x11f0 I was not able to reproduce this as I was testing with various runs switching siw and rxe as well as IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT sockets, while the above stack used siw with the non IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT patches [1]. Even if this patch doesn't solve the above I think it's a good idea to reclassify the sockets used by siw, I also send patches for rxe to reclassify, as well as my IPPROTO_SMBDIRECT socket patches [1] will do it, this should minimize potential false positives. [1] https://git.samba.org/?p=metze/linux/wip.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master-ipproto-smbdirect Cc: Bernard Metzler <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Acked-by: Bernard Metzler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 3, 2025
Reject attempts to disable KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on a memslot that was initially created with a guest_memfd binding, as KVM doesn't support toggling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD on existing memslots. KVM prevents enabling KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD, but doesn't prevent clearing the flag. Failure to reject the new memslot results in a use-after-free due to KVM not unbinding from the guest_memfd instance. Unbinding on a FLAGS_ONLY change is easy enough, and can/will be done as a hardening measure (in anticipation of KVM supporting dirty logging on guest_memfd at some point), but fixing the use-after-free would only address the immediate symptom. ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] Write of size 8 at addr ffff8881111ae908 by task repro/745 CPU: 7 UID: 1000 PID: 745 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-115d5de2eef3-next-kasan linuxppc#3 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x51/0x60 print_report+0xcb/0x5c0 kasan_report+0xb4/0xe0 kvm_gmem_release+0x362/0x400 [kvm] __fput+0x2fa/0x9d0 task_work_run+0x12c/0x200 do_exit+0x6ae/0x2100 do_group_exit+0xa8/0x230 __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3a/0x50 x64_sys_call+0x737/0x740 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f581f2eac31 </TASK> Allocated by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.746971s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_kmalloc+0x77/0x90 kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x652/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Freed by task 745 on cpu 6 at 9.747467s: kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 kasan_save_track+0x13/0x50 __kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x3b/0x60 kfree+0xf5/0x440 kvm_set_memslot+0x3c2/0x1160 [kvm] kvm_set_memory_region.part.0+0x86a/0x1110 [kvm] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x14b0/0x3290 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x129/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x900 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]> Fixes: a7800aa ("KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory") Cc: [email protected] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 6, 2025
When interrupting perf stat in repeat mode with a signal the signal is passed to the child process but the repeat doesn't terminate: ``` $ perf stat -v --null --repeat 10 sleep 1 Control descriptor is not initialized [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#1 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#2 ... ] ^Csleep: Interrupt [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#3 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#4 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #5 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #6 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #7 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #8 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #9 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run #10 ... ] Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (10 runs): 0.9500 +- 0.0512 seconds time elapsed ( +- 5.39% ) 0.01user 0.02system 0:09.53elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 18940maxresident)k 29944inputs+0outputs (0major+2629minor)pagefaults 0swaps ``` Terminate the repeated run and give a reasonable exit value: ``` $ perf stat -v --null --repeat 10 sleep 1 Control descriptor is not initialized [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#1 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#2 ... ] [ perf stat: executing run linuxppc#3 ... ] ^Csleep: Interrupt Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1' (10 runs): 0.680 +- 0.321 seconds time elapsed ( +- 47.16% ) Command exited with non-zero status 130 0.00user 0.01system 0:02.05elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 70688maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+5002minor)pagefaults 0swaps ``` Note, this also changes the exit value for non-repeat runs when interrupted by a signal. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Tested-by: Thomas Richter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
We sometimes observe use-after-free when dereferencing a neighbour [1]. The problem seems to be that the driver stores a pointer to the neighbour, but without holding a reference on it. A reference is only taken when the neighbour is used by a nexthop. Fix by simplifying the reference counting scheme. Always take a reference when storing a neighbour pointer in a neighbour entry. Avoid taking a referencing when the neighbour is used by a nexthop as the neighbour entry associated with the nexthop already holds a reference. Tested by running the test that uncovered the problem over 300 times. Without this patch the problem was reproduced after a handful of iterations. [1] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88817f8e3420 by task ip/3929 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 3929 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4-virtme-g36b21a067510 linuxppc#3 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Nvidia SN5600/VMOD0013, BIOS 5.13 05/31/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xa0 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x6e/0x300 print_report+0xfc/0x1fb kasan_report+0xe4/0x110 mlxsw_sp_neigh_entry_update+0x2d4/0x310 mlxsw_sp_router_rif_gone_sync+0x35f/0x510 mlxsw_sp_rif_destroy+0x1ea/0x730 mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_port_vlan_event+0xa1/0x1b0 __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_lag_event+0xcc/0x130 __mlxsw_sp_inetaddr_event+0xf5/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_router_netdevice_event+0x1015/0x1580 notifier_call_chain+0xcc/0x150 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x7e/0x100 __netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x10b/0x210 netdev_upper_dev_unlink+0x79/0xa0 vrf_del_slave+0x18/0x50 do_set_master+0x146/0x7d0 do_setlink.isra.0+0x9a0/0x2880 rtnl_newlink+0x637/0xb20 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x6fe/0xb90 netlink_rcv_skb+0x123/0x380 netlink_unicast+0x4a3/0x770 netlink_sendmsg+0x75b/0xc90 __sock_sendmsg+0xbe/0x160 ____sys_sendmsg+0x5b2/0x7d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0xfd/0x180 __sys_sendmsg+0x124/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0xfd0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [...] Allocated by task 109: kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0x7b/0x90 __kmalloc_noprof+0x2c1/0x790 neigh_alloc+0x6af/0x8f0 ___neigh_create+0x63/0xe90 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_init+0x430/0x7e0 mlxsw_sp_nexthop_type_init+0x212/0x960 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_info_init.constprop.0+0x81f/0x1280 mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_get+0x392/0x6a0 mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry_create+0x46a/0xfd0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_replace+0x1ed/0x5f0 mlxsw_sp_router_fib6_event_work+0x10a/0x2a0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Freed by task 154: kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 __kasan_slab_free+0x43/0x70 kmem_cache_free_bulk.part.0+0x1eb/0x5e0 kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x1f2/0x260 kfree_rcu_work+0x130/0x1b0 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Last potentially related work creation: kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x50 kasan_record_aux_stack+0x8c/0xa0 kvfree_call_rcu+0x93/0x5b0 mlxsw_sp_router_neigh_event_work+0x67d/0x860 process_one_work+0xd57/0x1390 worker_thread+0x4d6/0xd40 kthread+0x355/0x5b0 ret_from_fork+0x1d4/0x270 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Fixes: 6cf3c97 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add private neigh table") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/92d75e21d95d163a41b5cea67a15cd33f547cba6.1764695650.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2025
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)". One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix, deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. While doing that I identified the other things. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch linuxppc#1 and linuxppc#4. Patch linuxppc#1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch linuxppc#2 + linuxppc#3 are simple comment fixes that patch linuxppc#4 interacts with. Patch linuxppc#4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated I added as much comments + description that I possibly could, and I am hoping for review from Jann. There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series. This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] Fixes: 59d9094 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Nadav Amit <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Prakash Sangappa <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Uschakow, Stanislav" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2025
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)". One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix, deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. While doing that I identified the other things. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch linuxppc#1 and linuxppc#4. Patch linuxppc#1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch linuxppc#2 + linuxppc#3 are simple comment fixes that patch linuxppc#4 interacts with. Patch linuxppc#4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated I added as much comments + description that I possibly could, and I am hoping for review from Jann. There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series. This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] Fixes: 59d9094 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Nadav Amit <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Prakash Sangappa <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Uschakow, Stanislav" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2025
Petr Machata says: ==================== selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1q_mc_ul: Fix flakiness The net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1q_mc_ul selftest runs an overlay traffic, forwarded over a multicast-routed VXLAN underlay. In order to determine whether packets reach their intended destination, it uses a TC match. For convenience, it uses a flower match, which however does not allow matching on the encapsulated packet. So various service traffic ends up being indistinguishable from the test packets, and ends up confusing the test. To alleviate the problem, the test uses sleep to allow the necessary service traffic to run and clear the channel, before running the test traffic. This worked for a while, but lately we have nevertheless seen flakiness of the test in the CI. In this patchset, first generalize tc_rule_stats_get() to support u32 in patch linuxppc#1, then in patch linuxppc#2 convert the test to use u32 to allow parsing deeper into the packet, and in linuxppc#3 drop the now-unnecessary sleep. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2025
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)". One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. I cleaned up my prototype I recently shared [1] for the performance fix, deferring most of the cleanups I had in the prototype to a later point. While doing that I identified the other things. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch linuxppc#1 and linuxppc#4. Patch linuxppc#1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch linuxppc#2 + linuxppc#3 are simple comment fixes that patch linuxppc#4 interacts with. Patch linuxppc#4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated I added as much comments + description that I possibly could, and I am hoping for review from Jann. There are plenty of cleanups in the future to be had + one reasonable optimization on x86. But that's all out of scope for this series. This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1] Fixes: 59d9094 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Nadav Amit <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Prakash Sangappa <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Uschakow, Stanislav" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: fixes for PMD table sharing (incl. using mmu_gather)", v2. One functional fix, one performance regression fix, and two related comment fixes. The goal of this patch set is to be backported to stable trees "fairly" easily. At least patch linuxppc#1 and linuxppc#4. Patch linuxppc#1 fixes hugetlb_pmd_shared() not detecting any sharing Patch linuxppc#2 + linuxppc#3 are simple comment fixes that patch linuxppc#4 interacts with. Patch linuxppc#4 is a fix for the reported performance regression due to excessive IPI broadcasts during fork()+exit(). The last patch is all about TLB flushes, IPIs and mmu_gather. Read: complicated This patch (of 4): We switched from (wrongly) using the page count to an independent shared count. Now, shared page tables have a refcount of 1 (excluding speculative references) and instead use ptdesc->pt_share_count to identify sharing. We didn't convert hugetlb_pmd_shared(), so right now, we would never detect a shared PMD table as such, because sharing/unsharing no longer touches the refcount of a PMD table. Page migration, like mbind() or migrate_pages() would allow for migrating folios mapped into such shared PMD tables, even though the folios are not exclusive. In smaps we would account them as "private" although they are "shared", and we would be wrongly setting the PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE in the pagemap interface. Fix it by properly using ptdesc_pmd_is_shared() in hugetlb_pmd_shared(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 59d9094 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Tested-by: Lance Yang <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo <[email protected]> Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]> Cc: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <[email protected]> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Cc: Jann Horn <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Nadav Amit <[email protected]> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Prakash Sangappa <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: Uschakow, Stanislav" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2025
Patch series "kallsyms: Prevent invalid access when showing module
buildid", v3.
We have seen nested crashes in __sprint_symbol(), see below. They seem to
be caused by an invalid pointer to "buildid". This patchset cleans up
kallsyms code related to module buildid and fixes this invalid access when
printing backtraces.
I made an audit of __sprint_symbol() and found several situations
when the buildid might be wrong:
+ bpf_address_lookup() does not set @modbuildid
+ ftrace_mod_address_lookup() does not set @modbuildid
+ __sprint_symbol() does not take rcu_read_lock and
the related struct module might get removed before
mod->build_id is printed.
This patchset solves these problems:
+ 1st, 2nd patches are preparatory
+ 3rd, 4th, 6th patches fix the above problems
+ 5th patch cleans up a suspicious initialization code.
This is the backtrace, we have seen. But it is not really important.
The problems fixed by the patchset are obvious:
crash64> bt [62/2029]
PID: 136151 TASK: ffff9f6c981d4000 CPU: 367 COMMAND: "btrfs"
#0 [ffffbdb687635c28] machine_kexec at ffffffffb4c845b3
linuxppc#1 [ffffbdb687635c80] __crash_kexec at ffffffffb4d86a6a
linuxppc#2 [ffffbdb687635d08] hex_string at ffffffffb51b3b61
linuxppc#3 [ffffbdb687635d40] crash_kexec at ffffffffb4d87964
linuxppc#4 [ffffbdb687635d50] oops_end at ffffffffb4c41fc8
#5 [ffffbdb687635d70] do_trap at ffffffffb4c3e49a
#6 [ffffbdb687635db8] do_error_trap at ffffffffb4c3e6a4
#7 [ffffbdb687635df8] exc_stack_segment at ffffffffb5666b33
#8 [ffffbdb687635e20] asm_exc_stack_segment at ffffffffb5800cf9
...
This patch (of 7)
The function kallsyms_lookup_buildid() initializes the given @namebuf by
clearing the first and the last byte. It is not clear why.
The 1st byte makes sense because some callers ignore the return code and
expect that the buffer contains a valid string, for example:
- function_stat_show()
- kallsyms_lookup()
- kallsyms_lookup_buildid()
The initialization of the last byte does not make much sense because it
can later be overwritten. Fortunately, it seems that all called functions
behave correctly:
- kallsyms_expand_symbol() explicitly adds the trailing '\0'
at the end of the function.
- All *__address_lookup() functions either use the safe strscpy()
or they do not touch the buffer at all.
Document the reason for clearing the first byte. And remove the useless
initialization of the last byte.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkman <[email protected]>
Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Luis Chamberalin <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <[email protected]>
Cc: Petr Pavlu <[email protected]>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gomez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to linuxppc/linux-next-ci
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2025
Fix a loop scenario of ethx:egress->ethx:egress
Example setup to reproduce:
tc qdisc add dev ethx root handle 1: drr
tc filter add dev ethx parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 matchall \
action mirred egress redirect dev ethx
Now ping out of ethx and you get a deadlock:
[ 116.892898][ T307] ============================================
[ 116.893182][ T307] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 116.893418][ T307] 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 Not tainted
[ 116.893682][ T307] --------------------------------------------
[ 116.893926][ T307] ping/307 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 116.894133][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.894517][ T307]
[ 116.894517][ T307] but task is already holding lock:
[ 116.894836][ T307] ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.895252][ T307]
[ 116.895252][ T307] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 116.895608][ T307] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 116.895608][ T307]
[ 116.895901][ T307] CPU0
[ 116.896057][ T307] ----
[ 116.896200][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896392][ T307] lock(&sch->root_lock_key);
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896605][ T307] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 116.896605][ T307]
[ 116.896864][ T307] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 116.896864][ T307]
[ 116.897123][ T307] 6 locks held by ping/307:
[ 116.897302][ T307] #0: ffff88800b4b0250 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0xb20/0x2cf0
[ 116.897808][ T307] linuxppc#1: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_output+0xa9/0x600
[ 116.898138][ T307] linuxppc#2: ffffffff88c839c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c6/0x1ee0
[ 116.898459][ T307] linuxppc#3: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.898782][ T307] linuxppc#4: ffff88800c122908 (&sch->root_lock_key){+...}-{3:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899132][ T307] #5: ffffffff88c83960 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:3}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x200/0x3b50
[ 116.899442][ T307]
[ 116.899442][ T307] stack backtrace:
[ 116.899667][ T307] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 307 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.18.0-rc6-01205-ge05021a829b8-dirty #204 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ 116.899672][ T307] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 116.899675][ T307] Call Trace:
[ 116.899678][ T307] <TASK>
[ 116.899680][ T307] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0
[ 116.899688][ T307] print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xdc
[ 116.899695][ T307] __lock_acquire+0x11f7/0x1be0
[ 116.899704][ T307] lock_acquire+0x162/0x300
[ 116.899707][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899713][ T307] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[ 116.899717][ T307] ? stack_trace_save+0x93/0xd0
[ 116.899723][ T307] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
[ 116.899728][ T307] ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
[ 116.899731][ T307] __dev_queue_xmit+0x2210/0x3b50
Fixes: 178ca30 ("Revert "net/sched: Fix mirred deadlock on device recursion"")
Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently we saw an issue with hugetlb max order folio pages. The warning was getting reported on ppc64e but the problem also existed on ppc32 for ppce500 machine type and e500mc cpu type for it's unconventional max order of folio for hugetlbfs.
Hence enable kernel+qemu boot test with ppce500 machine as well to catch such corner case issues in future.
More details about this discussion is here...
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/[email protected]/