[Fix]: Fix NodeJS download link for armv8l#3102
Merged
ljharb merged 1 commit intonvm-sh:masterfrom May 6, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
I'd love a regression test - even a unit test that mocks out the arch - that can illustrate what this is fixing :-) |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the suggestion, that was helpful! |
Member
|
The mock is good, but we'd also need a test in |
ljharb
approved these changes
May 6, 2023
Abuchtela
referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2023
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #3035. Fixes #2845.
I wasn't sure what would be the best solution. Right now, if
NVM_ARCHisarmv8l, it falls back toarmv7lsinceARMv8is backward compatible withARMv7.I think other approaches are
aarch64) NVM_ARCH="arm64" ;;pattern toaarch64 | armv8l) NVM_ARCH="arm64" ;;. That way it would step into the following code block and also fall back toarmv7l.armv7l, create another if block to usearm64, something likePlease let me know if you have any suggestions, feedback, or concerns!