Skip to content

[Backport 2.x] Add capability to disable source recovery_source for an index (#13590)#14064

Merged
shwetathareja merged 1 commit intoopensearch-project:2.xfrom
navneet1v:2.x
Jun 11, 2024
Merged

[Backport 2.x] Add capability to disable source recovery_source for an index (#13590)#14064
shwetathareja merged 1 commit intoopensearch-project:2.xfrom
navneet1v:2.x

Conversation

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Backport of the PR: #13590

Related Issues

NA

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@reta , @msfroh can I get a review on this backport PR. The automated backport failed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 05b4b6b: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for d576b6a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@reta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

reta commented Jun 7, 2024

@reta , @msfroh can I get a review on this backport PR. The automated backport failed.

@navneet1v sure, needs #14072 :(

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@reta , @msfroh can I get a review on this backport PR. The automated backport failed.

@navneet1v sure, needs #14072 :(

Oh. will wait for your PR to be merged and will trigger gradle check again.

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

❌ Gradle check result for 7dbc163: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

trying again.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for c91a26a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

❌ Gradle check result for c91a26a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Flaky test: #13828

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for ca1b7e9: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for a4e4540: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for b27a5b4: TIMEOUT

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for d152e4a: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@andrross
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

❌ Gradle check result for d152e4a: FAILURE

#12197

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@andrross should I do a force push again to re-run gradle check.. :(

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for d152e4a: SUCCESS

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.37%. Comparing base (0dd892c) to head (d152e4a).
Report is 340 commits behind head on 2.x.

Files Patch % Lines
...org/opensearch/index/mapper/SourceFieldMapper.java 93.75% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x   #14064      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.28%   71.37%   +0.09%     
- Complexity    60145    61821    +1676     
============================================
  Files          4957     5071     +114     
  Lines        282799   290423    +7624     
  Branches      41409    42342     +933     
============================================
+ Hits         201591   207298    +5707     
- Misses        64189    65691    +1502     
- Partials      17019    17434     +415     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@navneet1v
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@andrross, @reta , @msfroh I can see a successful gradle check. can we merge this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement Enhancement or improvement to existing feature or request Indexing:Performance v2.15.0 Issues and PRs related to version 2.15.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants