[Backport 2.x] [rule based autotagging] add attribute value store#17441
[Backport 2.x] [rule based autotagging] add attribute value store#17441
Conversation
* [rule based autotagging] add attribute value store Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * add CHANGELOG entry Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * make the store interface generic Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * run spotless apply Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * add missing javadoc Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * improve javadoc for attribute value store Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * improve binary search bisecting expression Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> * add licenses directory Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <ravi.kaushal97@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 4648c3f) Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
❌ Gradle check result for 3312432: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
|
❌ Gradle check result for 3312432: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
|
❌ Gradle check result for 3312432: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
Cardinality tests seems to be failing consistently: |
|
I see that the following PRs are also failing due to same test suite
There might be some other underlying reason for failures. |
|
@kaushalmahi12 Could it be because #17380 is not in 2.19? I am seeing this error:
|
|
BWC failures were because #17419 was merged into 2.19 before it was merged into 2.x. |
|
❕ Gradle check result for c684bfe: UNSTABLE Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #17441 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 71.92% 71.95% +0.02%
- Complexity 65942 65968 +26
============================================
Files 5341 5342 +1
Lines 307223 307250 +27
Branches 44838 44842 +4
============================================
+ Hits 220981 221083 +102
+ Misses 67788 67710 -78
- Partials 18454 18457 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Backport 4648c3f from #17342.