fix: mock block data response data missing data attribute #818
Conversation
修复 mockService 区块详情缺失 data 嵌套结构导致无法正确加载的 bug
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple files. Key changes include modifications to method return values, enhancements for safer property access using optional chaining, and variable renaming for clarity. These adjustments aim to improve code robustness and maintainability without altering existing logic flows. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
chilingling
added
bug
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
mockServer/src/services/block.js (1)
75-76: Overall positive impact with suggestion for error handling.The change to the
detailmethod improves consistency within theBlockServiceclass and likely addresses the missingdatastructure issue mentioned in the PR objectives. This focused modification minimizes the risk of unintended side effects while improving code quality.Consider adding error handling to improve robustness:
async detail(blockId) { const result = await this.db.findOneAsync({ _id: blockId }) + if (!result) { + throw new Error(`Block with id ${blockId} not found`); + } return getResponseData(result) }This addition will provide clearer feedback when a requested block is not found, improving API usability.
packages/controller/src/useResource.js (2)
296-296: Approve: Enhanced safety with optional chainingThe use of optional chaining (
?.) inblockContent?.public_scope_tenants?.lengthis a good improvement. It makes the code more robust by safely handling potentialundefinedornullvalues forblockContentorpublic_scope_tenants.For consistency, consider applying the same pattern to the assignment within the if block:
if (blockContent?.public_scope_tenants?.length) { blockContent.public_scope_tenants = blockContent.public_scope_tenants?.map((e) => e.id) }This ensures that the
mapoperation is only performed ifpublic_scope_tenantsis defined.
Line range hint
292-305: Suggest improvements to theinitBlockfunctionWhile the change is good, there are a few suggestions to further improve the
initBlockfunction:
Add error handling for the
getBlockByIdcall:try { const blockContent = await blockApi.getBlockById(blockId) // ... rest of the function } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to fetch block content:', error) // Handle the error appropriately }Add JSDoc comments to improve maintainability:
/** * Initializes a block based on its ID * @param {string} blockId - The ID of the block to initialize * @throws {Error} If the block content cannot be fetched */ const initBlock = async (blockId) => { // ... function body }Consider standardizing the use of optional chaining throughout the function for consistency.
These changes will enhance the function's robustness, maintainability, and consistency with modern JavaScript practices.
packages/plugins/block/src/js/blockSetting.jsx (1)
435-437: Approve the change with a minor suggestion.The use of optional chaining (
?.) improves the robustness of the code by safely checking the existence ofpublic_scope_tenantsbefore accessing itslength. This change prevents potential runtime errors ifpublic_scope_tenantsis undefined or null.For consistency and to further improve robustness, consider using optional chaining for the
newBlockobject as well. Here's a suggested modification:- if (newBlock?.public_scope_tenants?.length) { - newBlock.public_scope_tenants = newBlock.public_scope_tenants.map((e) => e.id) + if (newBlock?.public_scope_tenants?.length) { + newBlock.public_scope_tenants = newBlock?.public_scope_tenants?.map((e) => e.id) }This ensures that even if
newBlockis unexpectedly undefined, the code won't throw an error when trying to accesspublic_scope_tenants.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- mockServer/src/services/block.js (1 hunks)
- packages/controller/src/useResource.js (1 hunks)
- packages/plugins/block/src/Main.vue (2 hunks)
- packages/plugins/block/src/js/blockSetting.jsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/plugins/block/src/Main.vue
🔇 Additional comments not posted (1)
mockServer/src/services/block.js (1)
75-76: Approve change with verification suggestion.The modification to wrap the
resultingetResponseData(result)aligns well with other methods in the class and likely addresses the missingdataattribute issue mentioned in the PR objectives. This change improves consistency across the service.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes, please verify:
- The structure of the response after applying
getResponseData.- Any existing consumers of this API are updated to handle the new response format.
Run the following script to check for other usages of the
detailmethod:This will help identify any areas that might need updates due to the changed return value.
修复 mockService 区块详情缺失 data 嵌套结构导致无法正确加载的 bug
修复 mockService 区块详情缺失 data 嵌套结构导致无法正确加载的 bug
3 participants
修复 mockService 区块详情缺失 data 嵌套结构导致无法正确加载的 bug
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: close #786
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor